Popcorn!! https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/ar-AA1tXAqY

Given the staunch nature of the US Supreme Court, good luck with them looking at it as an interpretive document. 

recounts? these people aren't election deniers are they? 

I don't care what they like.  It's interpretive only in the way as it should been seen from the POV as how the founders would have written it and for what purpose.  Not skewed with weird modern realities because the words can be minced and mixed to mean it in a way as to give any government entity more power than it was meant to have OR give any non citizen the same rights as an American. "Well regulated militia."

He needs to leave congress. He’s not fit to be there.